Beijing Yuanjia Law Firm · established 2006 China line 400-999-2039
YJ Yuanjia Law INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW
Resources / Explainer

Estates spanning China and Australia

Reviewed by: Beijing Yuanjia Law Firm — Yuanjia International Family Law Team · Updated: 2026-09-24
This page provides general information only. It is not legal advice and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer must review identities, documents, courts, property, evidence, and the specific facts before any conclusion is given.
Quick answer
What this page answers
Estates spanning China and Australia

Australian probate is state-based, and each state has its own procedural requirements.

The specific situation
The facts this usually involves

A deceased held a Sydney property and Chinese bank deposits, with heirs in both countries.

The first thing to do
Where to start in practice

Review both wills together for consistency before any administration begins.

The position in one paragraph

Australian probate is state-based, and each state has its own procedural requirements.

The Sydney property is dealt with through state probate, while the Chinese deposits are dealt with in China. A Chinese will and an Australian will can both be valid, and where they overlap the potential for conflict has to be identified early rather than discovered during administration.

A typical situation

A deceased held a Sydney property and Chinese bank deposits, with heirs in both countries.

Having two wills that inadvertently revoke one another. This is a drafting trap that becomes expensive once the person has died and cannot clarify their intention.

What distinguishes this from a purely domestic case

The Family Court applies a four-step property adjustment process, and superannuation is treated as property that can be split.

On the China side, the connecting factor has to be established on the documents: A Chinese court deals with China-situated estate assets. Assets abroad are governed by the law of the place where they sit, with China's conflict rules determining which law applies to succession.

The practical sequence in a Australia-connected matter

  1. Separate the question of who inherits from the question of how the assets are actually transferred
  2. Establish the applicable law for succession, which can differ between movables and immovables
  3. Authenticate the death certificate, the will and the relationship documents
  4. Address the practical release of each asset with the institution holding it

DFAT can combine authentication and translation in one service, which shortens the document stage noticeably.

How Australia documents are handled

Apostille issued through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), which also offers a combined authentication and translation service.

Marriage certificates come from the state or territory registry, so the document must be from the correct registry before authentication is sought.

Marriage certificates come from the state or territory registry, so the certificate must be obtained from the correct registry before anything else.

What has to be decided before filing

Review both wills together for consistency before any administration begins.

The boundary to plan around is this: Agreeing the shares and realising the assets are two separate problems; both need to be planned, and the second is usually harder. Where value sits in Australia — typically Sydney or Melbourne property, superannuation, corporate equity — it is handled by agreement or by a separate route there, not by an order the Chinese court could enforce directly.

If your situation has a Australia element

Inheritance cases stall when the evidence of the family relationship is incomplete. Send us the family tree and where each asset is held, and we will set out the route.

For Australian matters, superannuation and any family trust need to be identified early. Both sit outside the reach of a Chinese court, and if they are discovered after the China division is fixed, that value is effectively lost from the pool.

Frequently asked questions

Which law applies to which asset?
Generally the law of the place where the asset is situated for immovables, with different tests for movables. The interaction should be confirmed before applying.
Can one will cover both?
It can, but it must be valid in both jurisdictions, which requires attention to the formalities of each.
What if the wills conflict?
Then the question of which one governs becomes contentious, and resolving it is usually slower and more expensive than the administration itself.
Which Australia document should be dealt with first?
Marriage certificates come from the state or territory registry, so the certificate must be obtained from the correct registry before anything else. In practice the document that takes longest to obtain should be started first, not the one that is easiest to list.
Do you accept a matter with no connection to China?
No. The team only acts where the matter has a connection to China — a party's Chinese nationality, domicile or habitual residence, a marriage registered in China, or property, accounts, equity or evidence located in China. Purely foreign disputes are not accepted.
Do you accept a matter with no China connection?
No. We only act where the matter has a China connection: a party in China or holding Chinese nationality, domicile, habitual residence or identity documents, or property, a company interest, evidence, a document or an enforcement step located in or directed at China. Where everything — the parties, the assets and the documents — sits outside China and no Chinese court or authority needs to act, a lawyer in that jurisdiction is better placed to help and we would not be the right firm.
Need this connected to a China court path?

Free initial review of jurisdiction, documents and enforceability — before any cost is committed.

Request a review
This page provides general information only. It is not legal advice and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer must review identities, documents, courts, property, evidence, and the specific facts before any conclusion is given.